Killing_You

Civil War really would've worked better as Avengers 4 IMO. And to be honest, the amount of characters involved in the movie is miniscule compared to the comic. Some other interesting stuff from the comics...

Easy: SHIELD. They specialize in taking down super powered beings. Not every hero is super hard to take down; you just have to know what they can do, and plan accordingly. Sure, some are very difficult to take down, but they can still be taken down. It's even easier when you have super powered beings of your own to tackle the ones out of line. Specific weaknesses aren't usually necessary in the Marvel universe.

Granted. It stays good for a couple episodes, and then the rest of the series is utter crap. I wish M. Night Shyamalan would stop making movies.

Granted. By fixing the mistakes, you negate your need to go back in time, meaning the mistakes happened anyway. I wish it was 2016.

Assuming this follows the comic storyline Civil War, this whole thing will be over a thing called the Superhero Registration Act, which basically means that superheroes must register their secret identities with the government, and cannot take action without government orders. Iron Man is pro registration, and Captain America is anti registration. Black Panther (in the comic, at least) opens up the borders of Wakanda to any hero who doesn't want to register. Personally, I'm with Captain America. Superheroes need to be able to respond to a threat at a moments notice, and shouldn't have to reveal their identities. Especially given how easy it is for evil organizations (HYDRA) to infiltrate government agencies.

Granted. This place is invaded by tumblr. I wish I was an Avenger.

So Fant4stic is taking inspiration from just about everything but the comics.

I'll break it up by saying that these comics are awesome!

Granted. Aliens invade and we can't defend ourselves. I wish I had the motivation to clean my room.

Granted. 200 yearsater, former vault dwellers fix it up into their new home. I wish I had a 70" plasma screen TV.

The major turning point was when Kane essentially came back to life. I always saw C&C 3 as the natural progression of things.

Granted. The missing features are available for $5.99 per feature. $14.99 for the Forgotten faction. I wish I had scorpion repellent.

Granted. You lose the game. I wish I had Mortal Kombat X.

Granted, but OWA gets possessed by a bad lemon and implements microtransactions. I wish Spongebob was still good.

Oh god.. I think that's only legal to view in Amsterdam. Granted, but your wishception divides by zero and nukes the universe with antimatter. I wish to be an all powerful genie.

Granted, but you can't get in because opening the door would make it penetrable. I wish I was watching a Star Trek movie.

I just checked this out in LAN. The problem is that the CY seems to be too good at repairing the Service Depot.

Granted, but Xyrom starts hugging them all. Also they poo everywhere and stink up the place. I wish I could play Arkham Knight.

Granted, but he "made" the mayo himself. I wish for an ice cream sandwich.

Oldbies that I don't know! Welcome!

I was originally going to post this as a response to a post in a different thread, but I feel like this deserves to be discussed in a broader sense, and to avoid derailing another topic. I have to ask: why are people so concerned with what engine a game uses? To me, the only people who need to worry about engines are the developers, as they need to work with it in order to create their game. But why is it an issue for the average consumer (or player, for free games such as the ones at W3D Hub)? It's pretty baffling, honestly. To use a AAA example: One of the many criticisms that Call of Duty has received over the years is the fact that they essentially all use the same engine. Personally, I don't see why it matters, as the IW engine clearly does everything Infinity Ward/Sledgehammer/Treyarch want it to do, not to mention the fact that it's been tweaked and updated over the years. The same could be said for W3D; Sure, it's an old engine, but it's come a long way since Renegade came out in 2002. Just look at what we have so far; sprinting, digging underground, deployable artillery, walkers, jetpacks, chronoshifting, sandworms, etc... Stuff that nobody would've thought remotely possible 13 years ago. And yet, there is still a push for a switch to UDK or UE4 because they're "better engines." While I'm not blind to the advantages of moving to UE4, I do wonder why people claim that the switch would solve all of our issues and bring in tons of players. What are your thoughts on this? Is there something I'm missing here?

Mine is the Wheelman from Silent Hill: Downpour. Mostly for sheer creep level, but it's also because it was quite an interesting final boss.

I think that the Conscript is the only infantry model we have that is anywhere near finished. We're extremely far behind in the infantry department. *looks at OWA*

Don't hold your breath. Dungeon Keeper Mobile pretty much killed the series, in a similar way to Medal of Honor: Warfighter or C&C 4.

Companies are missing out on a LOT of opportunities these days.