Games [GAME OVER] CYOR - Supernatural Edition

[iLikeToSnipe]

1 minute ago, Shade939 said:

Why do you think he would?

So... Now you see why we don't know you're telling the truth?

[VERTi60]

1 minute ago, Shade939 said:

Why do you think he would?

He SHOULD, it was bad GMing on his part. Day actions don't work like they are there "just b/c of flavor" not confirming anything or not doing anything.

If you have designed this role then it's your fault

[Shade939]

Just now, iLikeToSnipe said:

So... Now you see why we don't know you're telling the truth?

Based on what you do know, do you have a reason to think it functions differently from what I stated?

[OrangeP47]

1 minute ago, Shade939 said:

It's redundant to assume you don't need to stay alive afterwards, since you can't capture patients while dead can you?

Well I don't "need" to anymore.  I suppose I can if I want to though.  You're making yourself a viable candidate

[Shade939]

Just now, VERTi60 said:

He SHOULD, it was bad GMing on his part. Day actions don't work like they are there "just b/c of flavor" not confirming anything or not doing anything.

If you have designed this role then it's your fault

I asked for a way to defend myself with unused abilities and ended up with being lynch proof.

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Shade939 said:

Based on what you do know, do you have a reason to think it functions differently from what I stated?

Because you're SHADE!

[Shade939]

1 minute ago, OrangeP47 said:

Because you're SHADE!

So, what do you think it would do instead?

[OrangeP47]

3 minutes ago, Shade939 said:

So, what do you think it would do instead?

It could be a true form shift, but the new form is not as defenseless and ability-less as you'd lead us to believe.

[OrangeP47]

Given XCOM is topical, and SCP is like XCOM, it could be like the transition from XCOM 2012 to XCOM 2

[Shade939]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

It could be a true form shift, but the new form is not as defenseless and ability-less as you'd lead us to believe.

So, iLTS is lying about my character then and the foundation being in game, and his passive?

[Sunflower]

Personally I'm voting for Shade because I think Verti doesn't want us to. And I agree with iLTS that it's a win-win situation. Either we find out he's telling the truth and don't have to worry about voting for him tomorrow or we find out he's lying, in which case he is obviously not town.

[OrangeP47]

8 minutes ago, Shade939 said:

So, iLTS is lying about my character then and the foundation being in game, and his passive?

ILTS doesn't know anything about your character, he can only speculate.

[Shade939]

Or, in the future Town would have needed a player around that was lynchproof, but since they got rid of that already.

[Shade939]

3 minutes ago, OrangeP47 said:

ILTS doesn't know anything about your character, he can only speculate.

Your theory is only supported if you omit specific events that have happened already though.

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Shade939 said:

Your theory is only supported if you omit specific events that have happened already though.

Nothing has been confirmed, it's all just speculation.  Your argument would have more merit if ILTS *himself* was not pushing for this course of action.

[Shade939]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

Nothing has been confirmed, it's all just speculation.  Your argument would have more merit if ILTS *himself* was not pushing for this course of action.

Yes, so why is he pushing for it?

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Shade939 said:

Yes, so why is he pushing for it?

Do you suspect ILTS? If so, why do you not vote for him?

[VERTi60]

8 minutes ago, Sunflower said:

Personally I'm voting for Shade because I think Verti doesn't want us to. And I agree with iLTS that it's a win-win situation. Either we find out he's telling the truth and don't have to worry about voting for him tomorrow or we find out he's lying, in which case he is obviously not town.

Right now I think shade is less scummy than iLTS. And Orange is confirmed non town. If we are suppose to test anything (even the flips), safest lynch is still Orange,no matter how you look at it.

[Shade939]

1 minute ago, OrangeP47 said:

Do you suspect ILTS? If so, why do you not vote for him?

I suppose at this point all I can say is I have my reasons, which I'm not happy with at all...

[OrangeP47]

1 minute ago, Shade939 said:

I suppose at this point all I can say is I have my reasons, which I'm not happy with at all...

Is it because he's vengeful?

[VERTi60]

1 minute ago, OrangeP47 said:

Is it because he's vengeful?

That wasn't confirmed yet, and thanks to you too 😛

[Shade939]

1 minute ago, OrangeP47 said:

Is it because he's vengeful?

There's also a broader context to consider of everything that's going on, you're focused on treating this as a normal game despite everything clearly pointing to something being off here.

[OrangeP47]

Just now, VERTi60 said:

That wasn't confirmed yet, and thanks to you too 😛

True, but Shade sure seemed to believe it earlier, it was his stated reason for being chicken D1.

Just now, Shade939 said:

There's also a broader context to consider of everything that's going on, you're focused on treating this as a normal game despite everything clearly pointing to something being off here.

And what would you suggest? Be specific.

[Shade939]

Just now, OrangeP47 said:

True, but Shade sure seemed to believe it earlier, it was his stated reason for being chicken D1.

And what would you suggest? Be specific.

I'd assume he'd infect anyone that touches him, which in order to catch him....

How many NK's have we had despite the fact that the NK should obviously be unstoppable to bypass all of these abilities?

[OrangeP47]

1 minute ago, Shade939 said:

I'd assume he'd infect anyone that touches him, which in order to catch him....

How many NK's have we had despite the fact that the NK should obviously be unstoppable to bypass all of these abilities?

I'll grant you a fair point that given his corrosiveness, he might do something like that.  Still, that's not much different than vengeful, and if he has that, he's likely non-town, and therefore there'd have to be some semi-safe way to remove him other than hoping a NK gets lucky.

As for NKs themselves, I don't think they'd have to be unstoppable.  It could just be set up for a long game, or there's other TPs that are supposed to do some heavy lifting, etc, and have just been incompetent.

[VERTi60]

Nobody seems to touch the fact that the only NK we had so far in the game was where iLTS claimed to "protect" his target.

[Shade939]

1 minute ago, OrangeP47 said:

I'll grant you a fair point that given his corrosiveness, he might do something like that.  Still, that's not much different than vengeful, and if he has that, he's likely non-town, and therefore there'd have to be some semi-safe way to remove him other than hoping a NK gets lucky.

As for NKs themselves, I don't think they'd have to be unstoppable.  It could just be set up for a long game, or there's other TPs that are supposed to do some heavy lifting, etc, and have just been incompetent.

A day kill was unstoppable though...

[OrangeP47]

Just now, Shade939 said:

A day kill was unstoppable though...

Even more reason to suspect NKs aren't.

[VERTi60]

And it's also very interesting that Sunflower is teaming up with Orange and iLTS - two of the most suspicious people next to Chopbam.

I think I'm getting a clear picture who the scum is in the game.

[Shade939]

3 minutes ago, VERTi60 said:

And it's also very interesting that Sunflower is teaming up with Orange and iLTS - two of the most suspicious people next to Chopbam.

I think I'm getting a clear picture who the scum is in the game.

I suppose we might as well ask what Day action Sunflower has, since we really don't have anything else to go on for her...