Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Shade939 said:

You know, one thing I question about that day was why @Killing_You, went along with Category 5's no lynch vote though?

The original plan was to nolynch and have me shoot iLikeToSnipe. I got talked down from shooting by iLTS and Jeod. Besides, very few people actually voted NoLynch.

By the way, Cat5 went along with my vote, not the other way around.

Posted
Just now, VERTi60 said:

I asked specifically on that, esp. when cat5 required dead people for his job... 

I understand Category 5 wanting to be more selective of the target for his ability, but I don't understand why KY was so quick to support him?

Posted
Just now, Shade939 said:

I understand Category 5 wanting to be more selective of the target for his ability, but I don't understand why KY was so quick to support him?

I think it was KY's idea, not Cat 5's. As previously stated just above.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Killing_You said:

The original plan was to nolynch and have me shoot iLikeToSnipe. I got talked down from shooting by iLTS and Jeod. Besides, very few people actually voted NoLynch.

By the way, Cat5 went along with my vote, not the other way around.

Yep, that does make sense actually.

Posted

Since I'm pretty certain we can narrow things down to only two suspicious players, I'm willing to wait on lynching someone then and letting Orange jail Chopbam.

##Vote NoLynch

Posted
4 minutes ago, Shade939 said:

Since I'm pretty certain we can narrow things down to only two suspicious players, I'm willing to wait on lynching someone then and letting Orange jail Chopbam.

##Vote NoLynch

Is there something I'm missing? I thought ChopBam and Orange are our two biggest suspects.

Posted
Just now, Shade939 said:

Either Chopbam or Orange is scum, plus probably whoever both players are claiming to have some form of protection from.

I'm still not so sure about the pairing of you and ilts :p

Posted
Just now, OrangeP47 said:

I'm still not so sure about the pairing of you and ilts :p

To be fair, Irish decided to make that character the doctor out of everyone here. :v

Posted

Hey do we have anything confirming Shade, either? He escaped a lynch or something and lost some ability or something else and that's all I know.

Posted
Just now, Shade939 said:

To be fair, Irish decided to make that character the doctor out of everyone here. :v

Does it even fit for the SCP106 (or w/e he claimed to be?)

Posted
Just now, ChopBam said:

Hey do we have anything confirming Shade, either? He escaped a lynch or something and lost some ability or something else and that's all I know.

Not really.  We just kinda took his word for it.  We didn't test if he's lynchproof.  And he might still have other abilities and just be lying.

Just now, VERTi60 said:

Does it even fit for the SCP106 (or w/e he claimed to be?)

Not particularly, no.

Posted
2 minutes ago, ChopBam said:

Hey do we have anything confirming Shade, either? He escaped a lynch or something and lost some ability or something else and that's all I know.

I jailed iLTS the first night, and then sacrificed all of my night actions so I don't have anything to work with.

Posted

I thought that being open and honest about my night activities would lend me some credence, but these other guys who are hiding in the shadows and claiming they're doing nothing, while simultaneously not being tracked or whatever, they get a free pass?

Posted
1 minute ago, Shade939 said:

I jailed iLTS the first night, and then sacrificed all of my night actions so I don't have anything to work with.

I'm a bit suspicious of the whole "two jailers" thing.

Posted
1 minute ago, OrangeP47 said:

Anywho, like I said, doctor's ap, I'll be back in a few hours.  Don't do anything drastic without me :v

Don't forget to put Shade(s) on if it's sunny outside.

Posted
1 minute ago, ChopBam said:

I thought that being open and honest about my night activities would lend me some credence, but these other guys who are hiding in the shadows and claiming they're doing nothing, while simultaneously not being tracked or whatever, they get a free pass?

Maybe you should do some better tracking then. :v

Posted

Shade, if you and Orange had jailed each other, who's jailing would have been stronger? Orange's action has side effects outside of the RB itself, so one would have to be able to take precedence over the other.

Posted
1 minute ago, Shade939 said:

Maybe you should do some better tracking then. :v

IDK, last night I was positive that Sunflower was going to be a safe track. Nobody ever targets Sunflower at night! I was wrong.

Posted

Who else would have been better to track? Orange again? By the time I got to the thread, it would have been long known already who he targeted, based on his claims and his target's complaints.

Posted
Just now, iLikeToSnipe said:

Here's my proposal. If we're going to do a no lynch we try lynching Shade instead. Prove his lynch proof claim. That'll at least give us something.

Really, out of every player here you should be the one with an actual ability on your PM that should tell you my alignment?

Posted
1 minute ago, Shade939 said:

Really, out of every player here you should be the one with an actual ability on your PM that should tell you my alignment?

Flavor != alignment. If it were I'd be obvious scum.

Posted
Just now, VERTi60 said:

@Shade939 do you have a lynchproof? Thought you lost everything when you became homeless :p

I should, that's what that day action I used was supposed to do. Sacrifice my nights actions to gain immunity to the lynch.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Shade939 said:

Really, out of every player here you should be the one with an actual ability on your PM that should tell you my alignment?

Can you elaborate?

Posted
Just now, iLikeToSnipe said:

Flavor != alignment. If it were I'd be obvious scum.

Why would your passive be directed at me if I wasn't on your side though?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...